
Trans Inclusion in Sport
Epistemologies of ignorance in constructions of fairness and biology: the online swimming community responds to Lia Thomas’ inclusion in women’s swimming events
Feminist Media Studies (2025)
Grand’Maison, Valérie, Victoria Clowater, and Lee Hill
Organized sport has largely been, and remains, segregated by sex. A long history of cultural norms and gender socialization discouraged women from participating and competing in sport. The conflation of sex and gender is produced by and further reinforces notions of biological essentialism that denies the full inclusion of trans people. Anchoring our analysis in epistemologies of ignorance, this paper critically examines the online discourses surrounding Lia Thomas’ participation in NCAA women’s swimming events to understand how the swimming community constructs notions of sex, gender, and fairness. We reviewed 1696 online comments on articles about Thomas’ participation in women’s events on a globally renowned swimming website, SwimSwam. We argue that biological essentialism functions as an epistemology of ignorance, where the dominant group actively reject or misrecognize scientific, historical, and sociological knowledges to justify the exclusion of trans women swimmers. In turn, biological essentialism erases equity issues within sport and, thus, effectively works to reproduce the privilege position of particular groups—in this case cisgender women and men—by protecting their opportunities to swimming success.
This paper was co-authored with Valérie Grand’Maison (corresponding author), a former Canadian paralympic champion, and Lee Hill, a former Olympic swim coach.
Access article.
(If you don’t have access through your institution, send me an email! I would be happy to share a copy with you.)
Transgender athletes and Canadian sport policy: a story of stigma and precarity
International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics (2024)
Bridel, William, Victoria Clowater, Dennis Quesnel, Connor MacDonald, and Jordan Zacher.
In this article, we examine the publicly available transgender inclusion policies of 53 Canadian National Sport Organizations (NSOs) in 2019. At the time of the study, only 17 of the 53 NSOs had policies specifically related to transgender inclusion. However, where these policies exist, they vary in their approaches to inclusion of transgender persons. This article examines how Canadian sport policies prohibit and/or police transgender persons’ participation in sport.
We reviewed these policies to understand the varying approaches to transgender inclusion in Canadian NSOs. We classified the NSOs into three broad categories: inclusive (n = 11), problematic (n = 1) and prejudicial (n = 5), in relation to naming, disclosure and medical specifications.
Using Judith Butler’s concept of precarity, we demonstrate that participation in sport is a precarious choice for transgender athletes, as most NSO policies lacked clear guidance on inclusion and there were next to no policy statements on gender non-conforming people.
The development of inclusive policy within sport should be proactive, actionable, consistent with best practices and must include meaningful conversations with transgender and gender non-conforming athletes, coaches and officials.
This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and by Egale Canada Human Rights Trust.
This paper was co-authored with William Bridel (corresponding author), Dennis Quesnel, Connor MacDonald & Jordan Zacher.
Access article.
(If you don’t have access through your institution, send me an email! I would be happy to share a copy with you.)